![]() If I wanted to make Apple look good, I'd focus on that part, but that would be rather biased to ignore the whole picture. That's only a small fraction of the story and could easily be forgiven. You're framing this as if it's all about the bounty and Apple just hasn't gotten around to it yet. And the rest of the comments here are just autopilot piling on the echo fest. Even I feel for company leaders in this kind of shitty journalism environment. The company hasn't denied the bounty, they're just incompetent / slow on this process.įeels like everyone is out to paint company with just confirmatory bias using whatever half-baked story is available. Thank you again for taking the time to report these issues to us, we appreciate your assistance." We want to let you know that we are still investigating these issues and how we can address them to protect customers. We apologize for the delay in responding to you," Apple told Tokarev 24 hours after publishing the zero-days and the exploit code on his blog. ![]() We saw your blog post regarding this issue and your other reports. We apologize for the inconvenience," Apple told him when asked why the list of fixed iOS security bugs didn't include his zero-day." Due to a processing issue, your credit will be included on the security advisories in an upcoming update. Why are people out to crucify Apple for a story that's still being resolved? The article clearly says:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |